Palin Couric:Couric Palin Interview
Palin Couric:Couric Palin Interview – Palin Couric interview has surfaced.Sarah Palin did an interview with Katie Couric where they talked about the economy and the fact that John McCain’s campaign manager Rick Davis received money from the controversial mortgage giant Freddie Mac until last month.Palin Couric interview transcript is below.
Sarah Palin on Rick Davis:
My understanding is that Rick Davis recused himself from the dealings of the firm. I don’t know how long ago, a year or two ago that he’s not benefiting from that. And you know, I was – I would hope that’s not the case.
Katie Couric: But he still has a stake in the company so isn’t that a conflict of interest?
Palin: Again, my understanding is that he recused himself from the dealings with Freddie and Fannie, any lobbying efforts on his part there. And I would hope that’s the case because, as John McCain has been saying, and as I’ve on a much more local level been also rallying against is the undue influence of lobbyists in public policy decisions being made.
Next, Couric asked about the $700 billion government bailout of bad debt – and whether she supports it.
Palin: I’m all about the position that America is in and that we have to look at a $700 billion bailout. And as Sen. McCain has said unless this nearly trillion dollar bailout is what it may end up to be, unless there are amendments in Paulson’s proposal, really I don’t believe that Americans are going to support this and we will not support this. The interesting thing in the last couple of days that I have seen is that Americans are waiting to see what John McCain will do on this proposal. They’re not waiting to see what Barack Obama is going to do. Is he going to do this and see what way the political wind’s blowing? They’re waiting to see if John McCain will be able to see these amendments implemented in Paulson’s proposal.
Couric: Why do you say that? Why are they waiting for John McCain and not Barack Obama?
Palin: He’s got the track record of the leadership qualities and the pragmatism that’s needed at a crisis time like this.
Couric: But polls have shown that Sen. Obama has actually gotten a boost as a result of this latest crisis, with more people feeling that he can handle the situation better than John McCain.
Palin: I’m not looking at poll numbers. What I think Americans at the end of the day are going to be able to go back and look at track records and see who’s more apt to be talking about solutions and wishing for and hoping for solutions for some opportunity to change, and who’s actually done it?
Couric: If this doesn’t pass, do you think there’s a risk of another Great Depression?
Palin: Unfortunately, that is the road that America may find itself on. Not necessarily this, as it’s been proposed, has to pass or we’re going to find ourselves in another Great Depression. But, there has got to be action – bipartisan effort – Congress not pointing fingers at one another but finding the solution to this, taking action, and being serious about the reforms on Wall Street that are needed.
Couric: Would you support a moratorium on foreclosures to help average Americans keep their homes?
Palin: That’s something that John McCain and I have both been discussing – whether that … is part of the solution or not. You know, it’s going to be a multi-faceted solution that has to be found here.
Couric: So you haven’t decided whether you’ll support it or not?
Palin: I have not.
Couric: What are the pros and cons of it do you think?
Palin: Oh, well, some decisions that have been made poorly should not be rewarded, of course.
Couric: By consumers, you’re saying?
Palin: Consumers – and those who were predator lenders also. That’s, you know, that has to be considered also. But again, it’s got to be a comprehensive, long-term solution found … for this problem that America is facing today. As I say, we are getting into crisis mode here.
Couric: You’ve said, quote, “John McCain will reform the way Wall Street does business.” Other than supporting stricter regulations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac two years ago, can you give us any more example of his leading the charge for more oversight?
Palin: I think that the example that you just cited, with his warnings two years ago about Fannie and Freddie – that, that’s paramount. That’s more than a heck of a lot of other senators and representatives did for us.
Couric: But he’s been in Congress for 26 years. He’s been chairman of the powerful Commerce Committee. And he has almost always sided with less regulation, not more.
Palin: He’s also known as the maverick though, taking shots from his own party, and certainly taking shots from the other party. Trying to get people to understand what he’s been talking about – the need to reform government.
Couric: But can you give me any other concrete examples? Because I know you’ve said Barack Obama is a lot of talk and no action. Can you give me any other examples in his 26 years of John McCain truly taking a stand on this?
Palin: I can give you examples of things that John McCain has done, that has shown his foresight, his pragmatism, and his leadership abilities. And that is what America needs today.
Couric: I’m just going to ask you one more time – not to belabor the point. Specific examples in his 26 years of pushing for more regulation.
Palin: I’ll try to find you some and I’ll bring them to you.
That’s all we have for now on Palin Couric:Couric Palin Interview.


kathy4change | Sep 24, 2008 | Reply
OMG – And to think – this “know very little” right winger could be a heartbeat away from the Presidency – She is still unable to answer real questions – Will she fool America? I do not believe Americans are dumb enough to put Liar Mc Cain and know nothing Palin into the White House.
Just the collapse of Wall Street speaks volumes about the deregulation that Mc Cain has touted – oops – now he’s changed his mind – now he is for regulation!!! He is not smart enough to fix this economy and will not know enough to surround himself with bright people to help him. I think Obama is smart enough to seek bright people to get together to implement a real pan to fix this mess. GO OBAMA/BIDEN
edmos | Sep 24, 2008 | Reply
1
edmos | Sep 24, 2008 | Reply
Sarah should be questioned about things she knows and has actually done. For example, she might know that Alaska has the distinction as the state with the most rapes/population. It may be interesting to ask for her reason for commanding, (during her mayoral stint), that traumatized rape victims have to pay for the (medical exam’s)rape kit themselves. Did this order bring in significant savings? does she have empathy for a poor rape victim who may have wanted to file a report but could not afford the cost? Does she mind that there probably are rapists walking her hometown’s streets who could have been behind bars ?
Shaken not Stirred | Oct 1, 2008 | Reply
Were these really the answers that she gave in the interview.
If someone were to tell me here is the answer, what was the question I would not have a clue that the response was to the questions
God Bless
MIND YOUR LANGUAGE | Oct 4, 2008 | Reply
First,she should consider learning English grammar before becoming VP. ALSO,TOO. We should not have a leader who can not speak proper English representing the USA. ALSO,TOO. English is her first language,isn’t it?